基于16SrRNA和转录组比较人工合成虾青素与破壁红法夫酵母虾青素对南美白对虾的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.a 江苏海洋大学 江苏省海洋生物资源与环境重点实验室;2.b 江苏海洋大学 江苏省海洋遗传资源与育种重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S9

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(42206139)、江苏省自然科学基金(BK20251050)和江苏省“青蓝工程”KK25301


Comparative Effects of Synthetic and Disrupted Phaffia rhodozyma-derived Astaxanthin on Litopenaeus vannamei: Insights from 16S rRNA and Transcriptome Analyses
Author:
Affiliation:

a Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresources and Environment, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China b Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources and Breeding, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang 222005, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本研究探究了人工合成虾青素(A)与破壁红法夫酵母虾青素(B)对南美白对虾的比较效应及作用机制。给对虾投喂添加梯度剂量(60、90、120 mg/kg)两种虾青素的饲料21天,通过检测肠道组织形态学、抗氧化及免疫相关酶活性,并结合16S rRNA测序和转录组分析开展研究。结果表明,两种来源的虾青素均以剂量依赖性方式提高对虾终末体重,其中红法夫酵母虾青素在较低剂量(90 mg/kg)下即表现出显著的促生长效应。此外,两种化合物均能增强肝胰腺样品的总抗氧化能力(Total Antioxidant Capacity, T-AOC),并抑制Toll受体相关基因的表达。16S rRNA分析显示,两种虾青素均通过抑制变形菌门、促进厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门来调节肠道微生物群,人工合成虾青素的调控作用更为显著。转录组分析揭示,投喂人工合成虾青素组的差异基因显著富集于咖啡因代谢、脂肪酸降解等代谢通路,而投喂红法夫酵母虾青素组的差异表达基因(Differentially Expressed Genes, DEG)主要与DNA复制和叶酸合成相关,人工合成虾青素主要作为代谢调节剂,激活氧化还原反应和营养代谢;红法夫酵母虾青素则作为全面性调节剂,通过外源物质代谢和生长相关通路刺激细胞外信号传导和细胞增殖,从而发挥更广泛的生理效应。这些发现为虾青素在可持续对虾养殖中的靶向应用提供了重要见解和科学依据。

    Abstract:

    Litopenaeus vannamei is an economically significant species in aquaculture. As the scale of aquaculture continues to expand, high-density farming often leads to disease outbreaks and feed-related issues, which negatively impact shrimp health, product quality, and farming profitability. Astaxanthin, a powerful carotenoid antioxidant, is widely used in aquaculture to enhance body condition, pigmentation, and growth performance. Currently, astaxanthin is mainly derived from chemical synthesis or biological extraction, with differences in cost, structure, and safety. Synthetic astaxanthin is low-cost and commercially produced, but may contain non-natural by-products, requiring strict dosage control. Natural astaxanthin is primarily extracted from Haematococcus pluvialis or Phaffia rhodozyma. Meanwhile, for different aquatic products, before using astaxanthin as a feed additive, the source of astaxanthin and its optimal addition level should first be confirmed to reduce costs and improve aquaculture and economic benefits. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate and compare the effects of synthetic astaxanthin (Group A) and broken-wall Phaffia rhodozyma-derived astaxanthin (Group B, a natural source) on the growth performance, antioxidant capacity, immune response, intestinal health, and gene expression of L. vannamei through multi-index detection and multi-omics analysis. Specifically, the objectives included: (1) Determining the differences in growth promotion, antioxidant, and immune-enhancing effects of astaxanthin from different sources and concentrations by measuring growth indicators, antioxidant enzyme activities, and related gene expression levels, and selecting the optimal effect groups for subsequent experiments; (2) Clarifying the differences in the effects of astaxanthin from different sources on intestinal morphology and microbial community structure of L. vannamei in the optimal effect groups through comprehensive analysis of intestinal tissue morphology and intestinal microbiota; (3) Revealing the differences in the effects of astaxanthin from different sources on the hepatopancreas of L. vannamei at the gene level by performing transcriptome sequencing on the hepatopancreas of the optimal effect groups. Ultimately, this study aimed to identify the most suitable type and concentration of astaxanthin for the growth and development of L. vannamei, and to provide theoretical basis and data support for the precise nutrition strategy and efficient environmental protection feed development in shrimp aquaculture. In this study, healthy L. vannamei with an initial average body weight of (15.64±1.99) g and an average body length of (13.90±0.58) cm were selected as experimental subjects. After a 3-day acclimation period, the shrimp were randomly divided into 3 treatment groups with 3 replicate tanks each (30 shrimp per tank). The control group (Con) was fed a basal diet, while the experimental groups were fed basal diets supplemented with synthetic astaxanthin (A60, A90, A120 at concentrations of 60, 90, 120 mg/kg, respectively) or broken-wall P. rhodozyma-derived astaxanthin (B60, B90, B120 at concentrations of 60, 90, 120 mg/kg, respectively). The experimental feeding period lasted for 21 days. At the end of the feeding experiment, samples were collected after 24 hours of fasting. Growth indicators such as final body weight (FBW), weight gain rate (BWG), specific growth rate (SGR), feed utilization ratio (FUR), survival rate (SR), and protein efficiency ratio (PER) were measured. Hepatopancreas and intestinal tissues were dissected under sterile conditions: hepatopancreas samples were used for the determination of antioxidant enzyme activities (including total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), acid phosphatase (ACP), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), and total nitric oxide synthase (TNOS)) and gene expression analysis (using quantitative real-time PCR to detect the expression of immune-related genes such as proPO, LZM, Toll-1, Toll-2, and antioxidant-related genes such as SOD and CAT); intestinal tissues were fixed with paraformaldehyde for morphological observation (H&E staining) or stored at -80℃ for intestinal microbiota analysis (16S rRNA gene sequencing of the V3-V4 region) and functional prediction (using PICRUSt2). Based on the results of growth indicators, enzyme activities, and gene expression, the optimal effect groups (A120 and B120) were selected for hepatopancreas transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) to analyze differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and functional annotation and pathway enrichment analysis were performed using GO and KEGG databases. The reliability of transcriptome sequencing results was verified by quantitative real-time PCR. All experimental data were statistically analyzed using SPSS 26.0 and GraphPad Prism 10 software, with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons, and P<0.05 considered statistically significant. The results of this study showed that both synthetic and broken-wall P. rhodozyma-derived astaxanthin had significant positive effects on L. vannamei, but there were obvious differences in their efficacy and mechanisms: (1) Astaxanthin supplementation significantly improved final body weight, weight gain rate, feed utilization, and protein efficiency, and increased survival rate at appropriate concentrations. Synthetic astaxanthin showed the best growth-promoting effect at 120 mg/kg, while yeast-derived astaxanthin significantly enhanced final body weight at 90 mg/kg, indicating higher bioactivity and utilization efficiency. (2) Both types of astaxanthin significantly enhanced total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), particularly at 120 mg/kg. At this dose, the yeast-derived astaxanthin also significantly increased catalase (CAT) and acid phosphatase (ACP) activities, demonstrating more comprehensive antioxidant and immune-enhancing potential. (3) At the genetic level, astaxanthin significantly regulated the expression of immune-related genes such as prophenoloxidase (proPO) and antioxidant genes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and CAT. Yeast-derived astaxanthin, even at lower doses, caused significant downregulation of key genes in the Toll pathway, suggesting a unique immunomodulatory mechanism. (4) Both astaxanthin types improved intestinal morphology, but in distinct ways: the synthetic group significantly increased villus height but reduced basal layer thickness, while the yeast-derived group significantly increased basal layer thickness without markedly affecting villus height, indicating better structural integrity. Microbiota analysis showed that astaxanthin optimized microbial composition by increasing beneficial bacteria (e.g., tentative Bacillaceae) and reducing potential pathogens such as Vibrio. Yeast-derived astaxanthin showed stronger enrichment effects for certain beneficial bacteria. KEGG functional prediction indicated that synthetic astaxanthin had no significant impact on major microbial functions, whereas the yeast-derived group led to significant downregulation in most functional abundances except purine metabolism, ribosomes, and amino acid biosynthesis. (5) Transcriptome analysis revealed mechanistic differences: the synthetic group was enriched in metabolic pathways such as caffeine metabolism and fatty acid degradation, while the yeast-derived group was enriched in DNA replication, folate biosynthesis, and other cell proliferation and repair pathways. Notably, the enrichment of the "chemical carcinogenesis-DNA adducts" pathway in the synthetic group suggests potential biosafety concerns. GO analysis showed that the synthetic group was enriched in "chitin binding" and "transport activity," while the yeast-derived group was enriched in the "extracellular region" and "growth factor activity," consistent with phenotypic results. These differences may be attributed to the structural composition of the two astaxanthin types (synthetic astaxanthin is a 1:2:1 mixture of left-, meso-, and right-handed isomers, while yeast-derived astaxanthin is purely right-handed) and other components (e.g., non-natural by-products in synthetic astaxanthin; glucans and proteins in yeast-derived astaxanthin). This study provides a theoretical basis and data support for the rational application of synthetic and disrupted P. rhodozyma -derived astaxanthin in the healthy farming of L. vannamei, contributing to the sustainable development of shrimp feed industry.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-22
  • 最后修改日期:2025-12-15
  • 录用日期:2025-12-24
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码