文章摘要
李战军,孔杰,孟宪红,张庆文,罗坤,栾生,肖广侠.3种DNA提取方法对WSSV检测结果的影响.渔业科学进展,2011,32(3):92-97
3种DNA提取方法对WSSV检测结果的影响
he comparison of DNA extraction methods in White Spot Syndrome Virus detection
投稿时间:2010-09-20  修订日期:2010-11-17
DOI:
中文关键词: DNA提取方法  PCR  WSSV
英文关键词: DNA extraction methods  PCR  WSSV
基金项目:国家863计划项目(2010AA10A401)、山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2009DQ002)、公益性事业(农业)科研专项(200803012)和中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费2009年专项资金项目共同资助
作者单位
李战军 大连海洋大学生命科学与技术学院
中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 
孔杰 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 
孟宪红 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 
张庆文 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 
罗坤 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 
栾生 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 
肖广侠 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所
上海海洋大学水产与生命学院 
摘要点击次数: 2950
全文下载次数: 1680
中文摘要:
      比较了酚 氯仿法、煮沸法、试剂盒法3种基因组DNA提取方法对WSSV DNA提取效率、纯度及病毒检测结果的影响。结果表明,3种方法的DNA提取效率平均值分别为 101.5、372.6、21.5 ng/μl;OD260 /OD280范围分别是 1.979~2.175(平均值为2.070)、1.699~1.932(平均值为1.796)、1.784~2.075(平均值为1.951);OIE巢式PCR阳性率分别为60%、50%、70%;TaqMan定量PCR检测的病毒阳性率均为100%,病毒拷贝含量分别为916.0~2.23×106、63.3~1.78×106、479.7~2.70×106 Copies/μl DNA。
英文摘要:
      In this study, three genomic DNA extraction methods including phenol-chloroform extraction, boiling lysis and reagent kit methods were compared in terms of extraction efficiency, DNA quantity, as well as the results of White Spot Syndrome Virus (WSSV) detection. The DNA extraction efficiency of three methods, was 101.5, 372.6 and 21.5 ng/μl, respectively. The ratios of OD260/OD280 were in the range of 1.979~2.175 (mean 2.070), 1.699~1.932 (mean 1.796) and 1.784~2.075 (mean 1.951), respectively. The positive rate of WSSV by OIE (Office International Des Epizooties) nested-PCR was 60% (DNA from phenol-chloroform extraction method), 50% (DNA from boiling lysis method) and 70% (DNA from kit method), while it was 100% by quantitative PCR (all DNA from three methods). The DNA copy number of WSSV detected by quantitative PCR ranged from 916.0 to 2.23×106, 63.3 to 1.78×106 and 479.7 to 2.70×106 copies/μl, respectively. The results would provide some reference for standardizing the detection of WSSV.
附件
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭