引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   View/Add Comment  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2190次   下载 1574 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
不同饵料组合对中国对虾幼体WSSV携带量及存活率的影响
肖广侠1,2, 孟宪红1, 孔杰1, 曹宝祥1, 刘宁1, 张庆文1, 罗坤1, 李战军1,3
1.农业部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所,青岛 266071;2.天津渤海水产研究所,300457;3.山东省海洋捕捞生产管理站,烟台 116023
摘要:
采用单胞藻(SA)、配合饵料(AF)、轮虫(BP)和卤虫幼体(BS)4种饵料,设计了SA+AF、SA+AF+BP、SA+AF+BS和SA+AF+BP+BS 4种饵料组合并用于中国对虾苗种培育,投喂SA+AF饵料的受精卵分设“碘伏”消毒及未消毒组,投喂其他饵料的受精卵均为“碘伏”消毒组。分析各期幼体成活率、P10体重及WSSV携带量,结果表明,N-Z期间,受精卵消毒与否及投喂不同饵料对中国对虾的成活率差异均不显著(P>0.05);Z-P期间,投喂BP的成活率明显高于未投喂BP组(P<0.01);投喂SA+AF+BS的幼体在M-P期间成活率与其他饵料组差异极显著(P<0.01);投喂SA+AF+BP 饵料组P10幼体的平均体重小于投喂SA+AF+BP+BS组的幼体(P<0.01);SA+AF消毒组P10仔虾WSSV携带量为10.52±3.3 copies/ng DNA,低于其他饵料组仔虾的WSSV携带量(P<0.05)。在P11-P60培育期间,分别投喂菲律宾蛤仔足肌(CF)+配饵(AF)、60Co γ辐照菲律宾蛤仔足肌(RCF)+配饵(AF)、高锰酸钾消毒菲律宾蛤仔足肌(DCF)+配饵(AF)和配饵(AF)4种饵料组合。结果表明,CF+AF组对虾体重和体长增长最大,但与AF组差异不显著,而CF+AF组和AF组与其余两组差异显著(P<0.05);4组对虾存活率差异不显著(P>0.05)。WSSV人工感染实验结果表明,4种饵料投喂的对虾累积死亡率都在90%以上,差异均不显著(P>0.05)。
关键词:  中国对虾  饵料  生长发育  存活率  WSSV
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31072206;31172402)和青岛市关键技术攻关类项目(11-1-1-11-hy)
Effect of different diets on the WSSV load and survival rate of Fenneropenaeus chinensis
Abstract:
Using microalgae (SA), artificial feed (AF), brachionus plicatilis (BP) and brine shrimp larvae (BS) , four diets including SA+AF, SA+AF+BP, SA+AF+BS, and SA+AF+BP+BS were formulated and used for rearing Fenneropenaeus chinensis larvae. All fertilized eggs were disinfected except the larvae fed with SA+AF. The survival rates of different treatments were compared at each stage. It was found that there was no significant difference in the survival rate at N-Z stage by feeding with different diets (P>0.05), but the survival rate of BP treatment was higher than others (P<0.01) at Z-P stage, while that of SA+AF+BS treatment was significantly different (P<0.01) from others at M-P stage. The body weight of 10-day post larvae (P10) fed with SA +AF+BP diet was less than that of SA+AF+BP+BS (P<0.01). The WSSV load of SA+AF treatment (10.52±3.3 copies/ng DNA) were significantly lower than that of other treatments (P<0.05) at P10 stage. During the stage of P11-P60, four kinds of diets, including Ruditapes philippinarum foot muscle (CF)+artificial feed (AF), R. philippinarum foot muscle radiated by 60Co γ (RCF)+artificial feed (AF), potassium-permanganate-disinfected R. philippinarum foot muscle (DCF)+artificial feed (AF) and artificial feed (AF), were used to feed the prawn. The CF+AF treatment gained the greatest increase of body weight and body length, showing no significant difference (P>0.05) from AF treatment, but with significant difference (P<0.05) from the other two treatments. The survival rate of CF+AF treatment was the highest but no significant difference from other treatments (P>0.05). WSSV artificial infection experiment showed that the accumulated mortality in all treatments were higher than 90%, with no significant difference among treatments (P>0.05) .
Key words:  Fenneropenaeus chinensis  Diet  Growth  Survival rate  WSSV