引用本文:
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   View/Add Comment  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 1554次   下载 1356 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
四种不同引进群体的凡纳滨对虾种虾形态差异性分析
樊云鹏1,2, 谭建2,3, 栾生2,3, 罗坤2,3, 隋娟2,3, 孟宪红2,3, 陈宝龙2,3, 曹家旺2,3, 孔杰2,3
1.上海海洋大学水产与生命学院 上海 201306;2.中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 农业农村部海洋渔业可持续发展重点实验室 山东 青岛 266071;3.青岛海洋科学与技术试点国家实验室海洋渔业科学与食物产出过程功能实验室 山东 青岛 266071
摘要:
种虾资源的好坏影响着整个凡纳滨对虾(Litopenaeus vannamei)产业的发展,从国外引进不同的种虾群体可以在一定程度改善我国的种虾资源。本研究以凡纳滨对虾种虾(所选种虾均为雌虾,在12~15月龄之间)为研究对象,运用聚类分析、主成分分析和判别分析等方法对4种不同来源的引进群体(PRIMO群体、SIS群体、厄瓜多尔群体和API群体)进行形态差异比较分析。结果显示,各性状的变异系数除了体质量外,其他均低于15.000%。单因素方差分析结果显示,在10个性状的比例参数中,头胸甲宽/头胸甲长和腹部宽/腹部长在4个种虾群体中无显著差异。聚类分析结果显示,PRIMO与SIS群体形态差异最小,与厄瓜多尔和API群体的趋异程度逐渐增加。主成分分析构建了4个主成分,累积贡献率为88.861%,其中,主成分1、2、3和4的贡献率分别为32.606%、23.982%、17.569%和14.704%。判别分析建立了4种不同来源的引进群体的判别函数,判别准确率P1为33.3%~67.1%,P2为30.8%~69.5%,综合判别准确率为52.1%。4个凡纳滨对虾种虾群体在某些性状比例参数上差异显著,在一定程度上产生了形态差异,但尚未达到亚种水平。
关键词:  凡纳滨对虾  形态差异  多元分析
DOI:10.19663/j.issn2095-9869.20200413002
分类号:
基金项目:
Morphological differences in four introduced populations of Litopenaeus vannamei
FAN Yunpeng1,2, TAN Jian2,3, LUAN Sheng2,3, LUO Kun2,3, SUI Juan2,3, MENG Xianhong2,3, CHEN Baolong2,3, CAO Jiawang2,3, KONG Jie2,3
1.College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China;2.Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China;3.Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China
Abstract:
The quality of ovigerous female resources affects the development of the Litopenaeus vannamei industry, and the introduction of different ovigerous female groups from abroad can improve the ovigerous female resources in China. However, it is important to analyze the morphological characteristics of the introduced populations to breed high-propagation and high-growth L. vannamei and obtain high-quality germplasm. Here, cluster analysis, principal component analysis, and discriminant analysis are used to analyze the morphological differences of four imported L. vannamei populations. The coefficient of variation for each trait was less than 15.000%, except body weight. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no differences in carapace width / carapace length and abdomen width / abdomen length among the four populations. Cluster analysis showed minimal differences between the PRIMO and SIS groups, and the degree of differentiation between the Ecuador and API groups gradually increased. Four principal components were constructed by principal component analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 88.861%. The contribution rate of principal component 1 was 32.606%, principal component 2 was 23.982%, principal component 3 was 17.569%, and principal component 4 was 14.704%. Discriminant analysis established discriminant functions for the four groups, and the discriminant accuracy P1 was 33.3%~67.1%, P2 was 30.8%~69.5%, and the comprehensive discriminant accuracy was 52.1%. The coefficient of difference for each trait ratio of the four ovigerous female populations was less than 1.28, indicating morphological differences among the four L. vannamei populations. However, the morphological differences did not reach sub-species levels.
Key words:  Litopenaeus vannamei  Morphological differences  Multivariate analysis