|
|
| |
|
|
| 本文已被：浏览 1030次 下载 967次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
|
|
| 近20年黄河口营养盐结构演变及现状研究 |
|
吴傲琳1, 钟正浩2, 于松3, 眭晓超4, 姚晓5, 邹立1, 王涛1, 边昌伟6, 江文胜1
|
|
1.中国海洋大学 教育部海洋环境与生态重点实验室 山东 青岛 266100;2.中国海洋大学 教育部海洋环境与生态重点实验室 山东 青岛 266101;3.中国海洋大学 教育部海洋环境与生态重点实验室 山东 青岛 266102;4.中国海洋大学 教育部海洋环境与生态重点实验室 山东 青岛 266103;5.山东省东营生态环境监测中心 山东 东营 257091;6.中国海洋大学 深海圈层与地球系统前沿科学中心和物理海洋学实验室 山东 青岛 266100
|
|
| 摘要: |
| 追踪和把握黄河口海域的营养盐分布和历史变化，不仅是西北太平洋边缘海域生源要素地球化学循环的关键内容，而且对区域富营养化和环境质量监管、污染综合整治具有重要意义。本研究延续该海域的营养盐及相关环境要素的现状调查，整理近20年的历史资料，分析黄河口营养盐组成和结构的发展趋势，揭示黄河口营养盐现状的主要影响因素。结果显示，溶解无机氮(DIN)、活性磷酸盐(DIP)和硅酸盐浓度总体由黄河口分别向北和向东南逐渐降低，但其组成和分布的时空差异较大，河口口门外出现异常高值；硝酸氮是DIN的主要组分，各组分相对贡献变化较大，都出现超过80%贡献率的状况；氮磷比(N/P)较高，最低为43.7。近20年黄河口海域DIN变化大致分为3段，2006年前逐渐增加到最高浓度(60 μmol/L)，到2009年逐渐降至30 μmol/L，之后到2023年在浓度小于30 μmol/L的范围内波动；DIP浓度在2005年和2013年出现峰值，2006—2008年浓度较高，其他年度浓度较低。除2000年，黄河口N/P不低于25，2010年以来呈现持续升高的趋势。主成分分析结果表明，营养盐组成能显著表征黄河口水质特征。黄河口海域营养盐组成和分布的极不均匀性以及高N/P，使得黄河口水环境质量情势严峻。 |
| 关键词: 黄河口 营养盐 组成和结构 历史变化 |
| DOI：10.19663/j.issn2095-9869.2023103100 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目: |
|
| The current status and 20 years of evolution of nutrient structure in the Yellow River estuary |
|
WU Aolin1, ZHONG Zhenghao2, YU Song3, SUI Xiaochao4, YAO Xiao5, ZOU Li1, WANG Tao1, BIAN Changwei6, JIANG Wensheng1
|
|
1.Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;2.Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266101, China;3.Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266102, China;4.Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266103, China;5.Monitoring Center of Ecology and Environment of Dongying, Dongying 257091, China;6.Frontier Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System and
Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
|
| Abstract: |
| The distribution and evolution of nutrients in the Yellow River estuary and its adjacent waters have always been a hot research topic on the geochemical cycle of biogenic elements in the northwest continental margin of the west Pacific Ocean as well as the focus of research on the eutrophication, environmental quality supervision, and comprehensive pollution control in the Bohai Sea. We conducted a survey on the current status of nutrients and related environmental factors in the Yellow River estuary and its adjacent waters in May and August 2023, during which period the primary production was high. Historical data from the past 20 years were collected and summarized to analyze and reveal the potential trends of nutrient composition and structure in the Yellow River estuary and to elaborate the current status and main influencing factors of nutrients in the Yellow River estuary. The main results are presented as follows.
The concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) varied wider and higher in August than that in May, 2023. The higher concentration was located outside the Yellow River mouth and west Laizhou Bay, and the DIN concentration gradually decreased toward the northwest and southeast from the Yellow River mouth. The lower value appeared in the northern waters of the Yellow River estuary. Although the average DIN concentrations in August were about half that in May, the variation of DIN concentrations in August was larger than that in May, with the highest value in August being about twice that of May and the lowest value being only about 1/10 that of May. Vertically, the surface layer showed the highest DIN concentrations, followed by the bottom layer, and the middle layer showed the lowest concentration. The concentration of DIP located at wider and higher ranges in August than that in May, which was similar to DIN. The DIP distribution was generally similar to that of DIN in tendency, whereas the average DIP concentration in May was comparable to that in August. Meanwhile, the difference in the surface, middle, and bottom concentrations in August was smaller than that in May. The concentration of DIN and DIP in the lower reaches of the Yellow River in May was about 4 and 2 times higher than that outside the mouth of Yellow River, whereas that in August was about 10 and 4 times higher, respectively.
Nitrate was the main component of DIN, accounting for 50.7%–96.5% (average 85.2%) in May and 3.9%–99.1% (average 57.1%) in August, respectively. Although the DIN composition was consistent between May and August, the percentage variation in the DIN composition was significant, and the percentage variation between DIN compositions in August was much larger than that in May. The DIN to phosphate ratio (N/P) waved at a wide range in both May and August, with a high average N/P of far from Redfield Ratio, among which the lowest N/P of 43.7 was observed in May. The average N/P of the lower reaches of the Yellow River was 910.7 in May and 410.9 in August. In comparison, the surface N/P was relatively high, approximately 1.5 and 3 times that of the bottom and middle layers.
The DIN concentration in the Yellow River estuary increased to 60 μmol/L before 2006, decreased to 30 μmol/L in 2009, and then remained under 30 μmol/L until 2023. The DIP concentration showed peak vales in 2005 and 2013 after increasing from those in 2006 to 2008 and were maintained at lower levels in the other years. The DIN was dominated mainly by nitrate in the past 20 years, followed by ammonia, and then nitrite. In episodic cases, ammonia and nitrite contributed to more than 80% of the total DIN, which may be related to strong terrestrial inputs and weak oxidizing conditions in the bottom water. The nitrogen/phosphorus ratio in the Yellow River estuary continued to increase in the past 20 years. Based on the developing trend of nutrient composition and structure in the Yellow River estuary and its adjacent waters, the imbalance of “more nitrogen and less phosphorus” may be further intensified. DIN and silicate both showed a significant linear correlation with salinity, indicating that surface runoff was the major input pathway for nutrients in the Yellow River estuary. The discrete point plots of DIN components and DO indicated a clustered distribution, indicating that DIN components and DO were influenced by some common factors, and the direct interaction between the two was weak or rapidly reached an equilibrium state. There was no obvious evidence of groundwater transport in study area, and the contribution and mechanism of dissolved organic matter conversion and primary production to nutrients must be understood through further investigation.
The results of principal component analysis indicated that the composition and structure of nutrients may significantly characterize the water properties of the Yellow River estuary. The extreme variations in the composition and distribution of nutrients, as well as the high nitrogen/phosphorus ratio, could push the water environment quality situation into a more severe status in the Yellow River estuary. |
| Key words: Yellow River estuary Nutrients Composition and structure Historic evolution |
|
|
|
|